Practice Management
Position Your Practice for the Future
From heightened competition to the potential for more M&A, here’s what the coming years will hold for planners.
This Practice Management article is intended for financial advisors only (registered representatives of broker/dealers or associated persons of Registered Investment Advisors).
When it comes to the future of their practice—and the advisory industry—what are planners most concerned about? Even more importantly, what can they do now to prepare?
I sat down with Ric Edelman, CEO of Edelman Financial Services and a top independent advisor, to discuss the key questions and worries we’re hearing from advisors. Here are some of the insights we gained.
Will there be more competition going forward, or less?
Our industry is going through a major evolutionary process. Competition is getting more intense. There are greater challenges with technology, the regulatory environment and in the markets.
Many of you may be first-generation RIAs. Those of us in that category invented the business, and we had it to ourselves for a long time.
Well, that party is over. Advisors today often don’t want to build their own firms, but instead join existing ones so they don’t have to hustle to find new clients, as we did. So the mom-and-pop shops of the past are morphing into bigger businesses, much as smaller accounting firms ultimately grew into regional players.
The days of being a successful sole practitioner with 100 clients managing a couple hundred million bucks are going, if not gone already. Advisors in that position will not be able to provide the services and technology tomorrow’s clients want. They also can’t manage the branding that will help keep current clients or add new ones. The only types of firms that will make it using this model will be those that are extremely specialized in serving a highly profitable niche.
Will the robos replace flesh-and-blood advisors?
It’s unlikely that the standalone robos have a sustainable business model. They’ll likely struggle to stay in business once their venture capital dries up. Many have already been acquired by a big player. Others are changing their business model radically to be economically viable.
Still, investor demand for a robo-based approach will be robust enough to make this a viable advice channel, but likely with a different business model. So the notion of technology-driven advice is here to stay. You can’t ignore it or say you’ll do a better job than any technology offering. If you haven’t already, move to incorporate the technology into your practice in some way.
This applies to higher-end advisors, as well as those serving the mass affluent. Robos are already adding value in areas including estate and charitable planning, both things that more-affluent clients tend to want to address.
What type of advisor will prevail—the generalist or specialist?
Both can win, depending on how advisors leverage these models. Generalists will need to have very large practices, with multiple locations that have a consistent look, feel and experience.
Edelman sees these firms as the Starbucks of the financial services world. Just as customers know exactly what they’ll get when they go into any Starbucks, clients of generalists will know what the experience will be at every step.
In contrast, specialists will do very well if they pick the right niches and establish themselves as true experts and authorities in those markets, through content marketing and the right positioning. Alliances with other professionals who serve their chosen niche—including CPAs and attorneys—will also be instrumental sources of new-client introductions.
Now we come to some top advisor concerns. The concerns we most often hear about tend to fall into the following five categories.
Delivering a high-quality experience
Advisors are well aware that a great client experience is vital if they want to differentiate themselves. However, it’s become significantly more challenging to deliver that exceptional experience. In the 1970s, for example, advisors typically were deemed outstanding if they helped clients select investments and set the right asset allocation, then conducted regular portfolio reviews.
Today, advisors have to address investments and advanced non-investment issues such as estate, retirement, and insurance planning. Many affluent investors won’t even consider working with an advisor who cannot accomplish these tasks.
Addressing this concern requires having systems in place to make your client experience replicable and scalable. If you can’t do something the same way 500 times, don’t do it.
That doesn’t mean becoming a cookie-cutter practice, however. It simply means delivering excellence every time. Advisors often need to narrow what they offer and to whom they offer it—for example, by serving one unique niche market or specializing in a particular solution.
If a prospect isn’t aligned with what you offer and who you are, don’t take them on. All decisions about who you are and what you do should be made around whom you are ideally suited to serve.
Building stronger relationships with existing clients
Advisors are (finally) beginning to see that they must engage with clients’ extended families—spouses, children and even grandchildren—to retain accounts and assets. Failure to do so can be extremely costly. It’s not uncommon to see advisors lose half of a household’s assets when a spouse dies.
CEG Worldwide research found that advisors report having 15 touches with their clients, on average, annually. But guess how many check-ins the affluent actually want to have? It’s 28.
Here, again, you need a system in place to reach out. Financial matters can be handled in person, via email, through webinars and through live presentations, seminars and client events.
But there should also be communications that focus entirely on the client—his or her life, family, etc. The affluent want to know they are more than just an AUM number to you. Cards, emails, quick videos made from your phone—these can all reinforce the advisor-client relationship.
Improving client satisfaction
One of the most effective and obvious, yet most overlooked, ways to improve client satisfaction is to measure it in the first place. Client satisfaction surveys, done annually, can help you assess your strengths and, more important, your weaknesses.
Significantly growing AUM
This task is also proving to be more difficult than ever.
Ask yourself how you spend your time. If you’re dealing with back-office duties and copiers and phones and routers, you’re not putting the focus on where it needs to be: getting new clients and getting more from existing clients.
For everything else that isn’t client-focused—human resources, trading, compliance and so on—you should be hiring others. Still need convincing? Our research has shown that advisors who increased their focus on business operations saw an average income drop of $13,567.
Attract qualified prospective clients
Placing significant focus on new-client attraction yielded an estimated average increase of $10,441 in annual net income, according to CEG Worldwide research.
The key is to get in front of the right clients, those you can serve exceptionally well and who will pay you well for doing so. Too often, advisors focus on bringing on as much new business as they can. Typically, many of these clients don’t have the amount of assets needed to compensate advisors adequately for their time.
Meanwhile, advisors are so busy trying to serve all these clients that they don’t have the time or resources to pursue the larger, more profitable clients. The end results: stagnant growth, overworked advisors, subpar client service, and diminished profits.
Overall, staying nimble and flexible, and always looking ahead to future trends, will help put advisors on the path to great success.
-by John J. Bowen Jr.
John J. Bowen Jr. is the CEO of CEG Worldwide.

The information provided is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be legal, tax or investment advice. The information contained herein has been provided by sources other than Lord Abbett which are believed to be reliable; however Lord Abbett cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this information.