Fixed-Income Insights
Our Answers to Three Key Questions about Short-Term Corporate Credit
Lord Abbett experts offer their perspective on the asset class in the context of current economic and market conditions.
In Brief
- Among the topics addressed in a recent Lord Abbett webinar on short-term fixed income was the state of the investment-grade corporate bond market.
- Our experts discussed the potential impact on the asset class of recent actions by legislators and central bank officials, including the U.S. Federal Reserve’s extension of its lending program.
- Also covered was the historical default rate of investment-grade short corporates in the past few decades, and the investor experience during periods of market stress.
- Finally, a Lord Abbett portfolio manager spoke about areas where he sees potential opportunity in short corporates, including the health care, technology, and cable/telecom sectors.
In the context of the recent market volatility, where might investment managers find opportunity in the short-term corporate bond market? That was just one of the questions tackled by Lord Abbett investment professionals on an April 14 webinar on short duration credit. Director of Product Strategy Stephen Hillebrecht hosted the presentation, which featured Partner and Portfolio Manager for Fixed Income Andrew O’Brien and Investment Strategist Joseph Graham. Here, we present edited versions of their responses to investor questions on short-term corporate credit offered during the session, along with some additional observations. To hear their views on the full range of topics covered in the webinar, please register to access a replay.
1. What are the implications for corporate bonds of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s (Fed) massive expansion of its lending program?
Graham: There were a couple of surprises in the Fed’s announcement on April 9, and they were generally on the positive side, in our view. (Read a full analysis by Investment Strategist Timothy Paulson.) The first was that the primary and secondary purchase facilities included so-called “fallen angels,” companies that had been investment grade until slipping below the ‘BBB’ level due to recent downgrades. Having the Fed as a source of financing is obviously a positive for those companies that had recently been downgraded from investment grade into the high yield category. But we think it was also good news for current issuers rated BBB, as many market participants were afraid of the effects future downgrades might have on those companies’ access to liquidity. We think that’s been a driving force behind the spread compression we’ve seen in the ‘BBB’ space in the last week. (see Figure 1). We believe the Fed news has been a real lifeline for those companies.
Figure 1. After Widening Considerably, Spreads on BBB-Rated Short Corporate Bonds Have Narrowed.
Spreads on the BBB-rated component of the ICE BofAML 1-3 Year U.S. Corporate Bond Index, March 12, 2010-April 9, 2020
Source: ICE BAML US Corporate Index data. All data as of 4/9/2020. A basis point is one one-hundredth of a percentage point. The historical data are for illustrative purposes only, do not represent the performance of any specific portfolio managed by Lord Abbett or any particular investment,
and are not intended to predict or depict future results. Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect the deduction of fees or expenses, and are not available for direct investment.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator or guarantee of future results.
2. What has been the overall experience of the corporate bond market during times of elevated defaults?
Graham: In our view, the selling seen in the short term corporate market has been driven primarily by investors scrambling to raise cash rather than real default risk in the near term. Very wide spreads implied substantial default probabilities over horizons we believed companies could survive. That’s what a dislocation is, though, and, in many cases, the utility of having cash on hand outweighed the prospect of owning a good credit for a few months, no matter what the yield.
This is something we’ve talked about with clients extensively: spreads in investment grade corporate bonds are largely compensation for liquidity risk rather than default risk. In figure 2, the solid line shows losses in corporates by rating category in the previous year, calculated by applying a conservative 50% recovery to Moody’s default figures. The dotted lines show average spreads for bonds of particular ratings in each of those years. What you see is that you are very well compensated by spreads for any losses in investment-grade (IG) corporate bonds (bonds rated BBB or above). Even in the depths of the global financial crisis, losses for BBBs did not exceed what investors were being paid for BBB risk prior to the crisis. So this time is likely not to be different, in our opinion. History has shown that IG companies don’t jump to default en masse, even in an economic shock as severe as this one. The impact of such a cascade of defaults to the rest of the financial system would be almost incomprehensible, which is why fiscal and Fed action were so swift this time. That’s not to say there won’t be any defaults; over the course of time there almost assuredly will be, but there will be winners and losers.
Figure 2. Corporate Credit Spreads versus Annual Credit Loss Rates
Historical data for the calendar years 1997-2017 (most recent available)
Source: Moody’s and Bloomberg. Historical data as of 12/31/2017 (most recent data available) OAS=Option-adjusted spread. For illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific portfolio managed by Lord Abbett or any particular investment. Subject to change based on changes in the market.
Hillebrecht: We think it’s important to remember that investment-grade companies typically have a lot of financing options at their disposal—for example, reserves, credit lines, and potential asset sales. With a lot of levers to pull, these companies potentially have the ability to stay on a steady financial footing during times of stress, making a fall from investment-grade to default in a short period very rare.
3. What is the investment team looking at now? Where is it seeing potential opportunities in short-term corporate credit?
O’Brien: In the wake of the pandemic crisis, we are undertaking a fundamental reassessment, trying to figure out which companies are going make it to the other side of this. And how might the environment for corporate issuers look when that time comes?
It’s a two-step test. One, we need to ascertain whether companies have a bridge to help them get to the other side of this economic disruption. You can't assume that “if business picks up in three months, then this company will be okay." We believe you need to make sure the issuer in question has the liquidity to get through those three months. It would be overly simplistic, for example, to just assume a 40% reduction in annual income and make your calculations from there. Instead, we believe that it is necessary to heighten the stress scenario and say, "Let's take their income to zero for three months and see how things look"—and repeat that process for all the issuers under scrutiny.
The second thing we are looking at is the level of support an issuer may have. Does it have access to the Fed programs that have been announced since the crisis began? Does it have a sponsor backing it that is likely to provide liquidity if they need it? Are banks willing to help this particular issuer? We've seen that even in some of the industries undergoing the greatest financial stress—industries that are right at the epicenter of the crisis--there are a number of different responses to bolstering financial strength. I think being an investment-grade issuer means you do have some flexibility in such episodes.
As we look out over the landscape though, and as we think about where we want to be positioned in the coming weeks, months, and quarters, our focus right now in the corporate space is on what we call “secular winners.” We are looking at industries like health care, technology, cable and telecom—businesses that have been less disrupted by the measures to contain the virus and in fact, may actually be in a stronger position because of the way the situation is playing out.
For example, look at the cable industry. People have seen the value of technology, especially as it relates to conducting their business and personal lives on the Internet. Based on industry reports, more people are upgrading their Internet service by choosing more robust cable broadband.
As for health care, I think there will be a lot more government support for the sector. Essential service providers like hospitals that have faced operating stresses in the current environment are likely to get additional help from the government, in our view. That seems to us like it may be another secular winner.
Overall, we believe there are potential opportunities in identifying the sectors that will benefit most as the U.S. economy begins to reopen. In terms of our short duration credit strategy, we think high-quality banks may potentially be among the best places to be. Banks are, in some ways, a levered bet on the strength of the economy just by the nature of their business. And banks should be helped by a recovering U.S. economy—and all the support that the Fed and the U.S. government have provided in terms of liquidity and market functions. We think the larger, higher-quality banks could potentially be in a good position to benefit from these conditions.
Strategies with a more aggressive credit orientation may be worth consideration as the economy begins to reopen—for example, metals producers, home builders, and other building-related businesses. If we have a return to economic growth, and a more stable labor market, we think that should potentially help the housing sector, along , of course, with the very low mortgage rates we’re seeing right now.
To sum up, there will be industries that benefit directly as the economy gets back on its feet, and we will be actively examining opportunities in the sectors we’ve mentioned as that happens. But for the short duration strategy right now, we are focused on issuers in the industries that could be longer-term secular winners, like health care, technology, and cable.
A Note about Risk: The value of investments in fixed-income securities will change as interest rates fluctuate and in response to market movements. Generally, when interest rates rise, the prices of debt securities fall, and when interest rates fall, prices generally rise. High-yield securities, sometimes called junk bonds, carry increased risks of price volatility, illiquidity, and the possibility of default in the timely payment of interest and principal. Bonds may also be subject to other types of risk, such as call, credit, liquidity, interest-rate, and general market risks. Longer-term debt securities are usually more sensitive to interest-rate changes; the longer the maturity of a security, the greater the effect a change in interest rates is likely to have on its price. Lower-rated bonds may be subject to greater risk than higher-rated bonds.
No investing strategy can overcome all market volatility or guarantee future results.
Statements concerning financial market trends are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that markets will perform in a similar manner under similar conditions in the future.
Forecasts and projections are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. Projections should not be considered a guarantee.
This commentary may contain assumptions that are “forward-looking statements,” which are based on certain assumptions of future events. Actual events are difficult to predict and may differ from those assumed. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will materialize or that actual returns or results will not be materially different from those described here.
Treasuries are debt securities issued by the U.S. government and secured by its full faith and credit. Income from Treasury securities is exempt from state and local taxes.
A basis point is one one-hundredth of a percentage point.
Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of the price (the value of principal) of a fixed-income investment to a change in interest rates.
Fallen angel refers to a bond that was initially given an investment-grade rating but has since been reduced to below investment-grade status.
The recovery rate is the extent to which principal and accrued interest on defaulted debt can be recovered, expressed as a percentage of face value.
Spread is the percentage difference in current yields of various classes of fixed-income securities versus Treasury bonds or another benchmark bond measure. A bond spread is often expressed as a difference in percentage points or basis points (which equal one-one hundredth of a percentage point). The option-adjusted spread (OAS) measures the difference in yield between a bond with an embedded option, such as an MBS or callable bonds, with the yield on Treasuries.
Yield to maturity is the rate of return anticipated on a bond if held until it matures.
The ICE BofA/Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate 1-3 Year Index is an unmanaged index comprised of U.S. dollar denominated investment grade corporate debt securities publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market with between one and three year remaining to final maturity.
ICE BofAML Index Information:
Source ICE Data Indices, LLC (“ICE”), used with permission. ICE PERMITS USE OF THE ICE BofAML INDICES AND RELATED DATA ON AN “AS IS” BASIS, MAKES NO WARRANTIES REGARDING SAME, DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE SUITABILITY, QUALITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, AND/OR COMPLETENESS OF THE ICE BofAML INDICES OR ANY DATA INCLUDED IN, RELATED TO, OR DERIVED THEREFROM, ASSUMES NO LIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THE FOREGOING, AND DOES NOT SPONSOR, ENDORSE, OR RECOMMEND LORD ABBETT, OR ANY OF ITS PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.
Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect the deduction of fees or expenses, and are not available for direct investment.
The credit quality of the securities are assigned by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), such as Standard & Poor's, Moody's, or Fitch, as an indication of an issuer's creditworthiness. Ratings range from 'AAA' (highest) to 'D' (lowest). Bonds rated 'BBB' or above are considered investment grade. Credit ratings 'BB' and below are lower-rated securities (junk bonds). High-yielding, non-investment-grade bonds (junk bonds) involve higher risks than investment-grade bonds. Adverse conditions may affect the issuer's ability to pay interest and principle on these securities.
The information provided is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information about Lord Abbett’s products and services and to otherwise provide general investment education. None of the information provided should be regarded as a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action as neither Lord Abbett nor its affiliates are undertaking to provide impartial investment advice, act as an impartial adviser, or give advice in a fiduciary capacity. If you are an individual retirement investor, contact your financial advisor or other fiduciary about whether any given investment idea, strategy, product or service may be appropriate for your circumstances.
The opinions in this commentary are as of the date of publication, are subject to change based on subsequent developments, and may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole. The material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research, or investment advice, is not a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy, and is not intended to predict or depict the performance of any investment. Readers should not assume that investments in companies, securities, sectors, and/or markets described were or will be profitable. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. This document is prepared based on the information Lord Abbett deems reliable; however, Lord Abbett does not warrant the accuracy and completeness of the information. Investors should consult with a financial advisor prior to making an investment decision.