Website Feedback

Use this form to give us your feedback or report any problems you experienced finding information on our Website.

* Indicates Required Fields

Website Feedback

Thank you for providing feedback.

For Financial Investoraccs
 
| |
loading...

AMT Free Municipal Bond Fund (LATAX) - Class A

Fund Finder
Market Review (as of 03/29/2013)

Demand for municipal bonds was strong during the first half of the quarter, before slowing in the second half. Investor momentum turned as municipal bond yields, which tend to follow Treasury yields, rose during the final month of the quarter. Supply, however, was subdued throughout the first two and a half months, before picking up the pace in March. Replaying a familiar theme from 2012, much of the issuance this year has consisted of refunded outstanding bonds that were near their first optional call dates.

Municipal bonds outperformed Treasuries during the first half of the quarter, but underperformed throughout most maturities in the second half, leaving the ratios of municipal bond yields to Treasury yields slightly higher than their levels at the start of the year. Demand for lower-quality municipal bonds continued to remain strong, as investors searched for yield in a low-rate environment; as a result, lower-quality bonds outperformed higher-quality bonds. In a reversal from last year's trend, bonds with shorter maturities performed better than intermediate-maturity and longer-maturity bonds, as interest rates increased on the intermediate and long end of the yield curve as the economy showed some signs of improvement.

Following the "fiscal cliff" deal on January 1, investors shifted their focus to a proposal circulating around Washington that would limit the tax exemption of municipal bonds to 28% for high-income earners. Over the past few months, there have been significant efforts by several groups to educate politicians on the unintentional impacts of such a change. Though the matter is not yet settled, the ramp-up in discussions with lawmakers is encouraging, as it reduces the probability that such a proposal will be implemented.

Fund Review (as of 03/29/2013)

The Fund returned 0.44%, reflecting performance at the net asset value (NAV) of Class A shares, with all distributions reinvested, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013. The Fund's benchmark, the Barclays Municipal Bond Index,1 returned 0.29% in the same period. The Fund's average annual total returns, which reflect performance at the maximum 2.25% sales charge applicable to Class A share investments and includes the reinvestment of all distributions, as of March 31, 2013, are: one year: 5.89%; and since inception (October 29, 2010): 7.27%. Expense ratio, gross: 0.91%, and net: 0.60%.

Performance data quoted represent past performance, which does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the fund will fluctuate so that shares, on any given day or when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month-end, call Lord Abbett at 1-888-522-2388 or visit us at www.lordabbett.com.

Investors continued their hunt for yield in a low-rate environment, and were comfortable assuming additional credit risk in the search for incremental yield. As a result, the strongest contributor to relative Fund performance was the overweight to bonds rated below 'BBB.' Below-investment-grade bonds performed the best on an absolute basis, as credit quality continued to improve along with the economy. Bonds rated higher than 'BBB' were the worst performing credit quality category within the index.

Bonds in the two- to seven-year maturity range performed the best on an absolute basis during the period, as interest rates mostly increased in longer maturity bonds on signs of an improving economy. Bonds with maturities of two years and shorter performed the worst on a relative basis, as very low yields persisted leaving very little room for further price appreciation.

From a sector perspective, the best performing sectors on an absolute performance basis were tobacco and private-education bonds. Tobacco bonds benefited from a binding agreement on a new method of determining payments tobacco companies must pay under the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement. Private-education bonds performed well, as investors sought incremental yield opportunities through investment-grade credits. Government lease appropriation bonds and public-education bonds, however, were among the sector laggards during the period.

At the state level, Texas bonds outperformed due to the underlying sectors within the state, as opposed to any specific issues with the state itself. New Jersey bonds underperformed as the state continued to face elevated budgetary and economic pressures relative to other parts of the country.

Please refer to www.lordabbett.com under the "Portfolio" tab for a complete list of holdings of the Fund, including the securities discussed above.

Outlook
Municipal bond yields continue to remain attractive on a taxable-equivalent basis, compared with yields of other taxable fixed-income alternatives. Demand for municipals started the year strong, before slowing during the final month of the quarter. The slowdown in demand was primarily driven by upward pressure on interest rates. As the year progresses, demand will depend upon the stability of interest rates as well as investors' comfort with market yields. Supply started the year off at a slow pace of issuance, but increased during the final month of the quarter. Similar to 2012, much of the issuance consisted of refunded outstanding bonds that were near their first optional call dates. We anticipate a similar volume of supply for 2013, barring any meaningful change in interest rates.

The ratio of municipal bond yields to Treasury yields remains low relative to the ratios since 2008; however, these ratios are still above pre-2008 levels. Municipal bond yields are near 100% of Treasury yields, and from an aftertax perspective, continue to remain attractive. The ratios across all maturities are expected to stay within a tight range throughout the remainder of the year.

A concern many municipal bond investors share is the proposal circulating around Washington that would limit the tax exemption of municipal bonds to 28% for high-income earners. Over recent months, there have been concerted efforts by several groups to educate politicians regarding the unintentional impacts of such a change. Even though the matter is not yet settled, the ramp-up in discussions with lawmakers is encouraging, as it reduces the probability that such a proposal will be implemented.

With interest rates at such low levels, increased demand for lower-quality municipal bonds is expected to continue as credit quality remains steady. In addition, we expect the lower half of the investment-grade range to continue to perform strongly as well.

The Federal Reserve has reiterated that it will attempt to keep short-term interest rates low for an extended period; as a result, the expectation is that the yield curve will remain steep and that longer-maturity bonds will outperform, although expected returns also look favorable in the 10-year maturity range. The increase in income by extending out the yield curve is significant in the context of a benign interest rate environment.

State revenues have increased each quarter as the economy continues to recover from the Great Recession. Going forward, slow economic growth and less than expected funding from the federal government is expected to encourage states to continue carefully managing their expenses amid a challenging environment for budgets. Given their recent success in recovering from the recession, we expect the vast majority of states to maintain their positive economic trends.

1 The Barclays Municipal Bond Index is a rules-based, market-value-weighted index engineered for the long-term tax-exempt bond market. The index is a broad measure of the municipal bond market with maturities of at least one year. To be included in this index, bonds must have a minimum credit rating of at least Baa, an outstanding par value of at least $7 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $75 million.

Unless otherwise specified, indexes reflect total return, with all dividends reinvested. An index is unmanaged, does not reflect the deduction of fees or expenses, and is not available for direct investment.

Instances of high double-digit returns were achieved primarily during favorable market conditions and may not be sustainable over time.

The credit quality of the securities are assigned by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), such as Standard & Poor's, Moody's, or Fitch, as an indication of an issuer's creditworthiness. Ratings range from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). Bonds rated BBB or above are considered investment grade. Credit ratings BB and below are lower-rated securities (junk bonds). High-yielding, non-investment-grade bonds (junk bonds) involve higher risks than investment-grade bonds. Adverse conditions may affect the issuer's ability to pay interest and principal on these securities.

The yield spread is the difference between yields on differing debt instruments, calculated by deducting the yield of one instrument from another. The higher the yield spread, the greater the difference between the yields offered by each instrument. The spread can be measured between debt instruments of differing maturities, credit ratings and risk.

The Fund's portfolio is actively managed and, therefore, its holdings and the weightings of a particular issuer or particular sector as a percentage of portfolio assets may change significantly over time. Sectors may include many industries. The mention of specific portfolio holdings is for information only. It does not constitute a recommendation or an offer for a particular security or fund, nor should it be taken as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell securities or other investments.

Note: Class A shares purchased subject to a front-end sales charge have no contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC). However, certain purchases of Class A shares made without a front-end sales charge may be subject to a CDSC of 1% if the shares are redeemed before the first day of the month in which the one-year anniversary of the purchase falls. Please refer to the prospectus for more information on redemptions that may be subject to a CDSC. The CDSC is not reflected in the average annual returns. If these charges had been included, performance would have been lower.

Expense Ratio: The net expense ratio takes into account a contractual management fee waiver/expense reimbursement agreement that currently is scheduled to remain in place through January 31, 2014. For periods when gross expenses exceeded the cap, the Fund benefited by not bearing certain interest and related expenses. Without such cap, performance would have been lower. In addition, the net expense ratio takes into account deductions for certain interest and related expenses from certain of the Fund's investments. Under accounting rules, the Fund recognized additional income in an amount that directly offsets these interest and related expenses. Therefore, the Fund's total returns and net asset value were not affected by such interest and related expenses.

U.S. Treasuries are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The rate of return of a mutual fund investment, however, is not guaranteed and will fluctuate with changes in market conditions; therefore, there is a greater risk to your investment capital.

Taxable equivalent yield is the pretax yield that a taxable bond needs to possess for its yield to be equal to that of a tax-free municipal bond. It does not reflect state and local income taxes or the alternative minimum tax, if any, and will vary based on each investor's tax bracket.

A yield curve is a line that plots the interest rates, at a set point in time, of bonds having equal credit quality, but differing maturity dates.

The views and information discussed in this commentary are as of March 31, 2013, are subject to change, and may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole. The views expressed in market commentaries are at a specific point in time, are opinions only and should not be relied upon as a forecast, research, or investment advice regarding a particular investment or the markets in general. Information discussed should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell securities.

RELATED CONTENT