We strive to provide the highest level of client satisfaction, and handle each request with the utmost importance. We expect to respond to each request we receive within one business day of receipt.
Please note that trades cannot be processed via e-mail for security reasons. If your inquiry requires immediate assistance, please call us at
1-800-821-5129 (8:30 a.m.-6:00 p.m. EST, Mon-Fri).
Thank you for contacting Lord Abbett. A member of our staff will contact you between X:XXpm EST and XX:XXpm EST [today OR XX/XX/XXXX]. A confirmation has been sent to your email address.Close
Use this form to give us your feedback or report any problems you experienced finding information on our Website.
* Indicates Required Fields
Thank you for providing feedback.
Before the financial crisis of 2008–09, it would have been significant news if yields on municipal bonds had exceeded those on Treasury securities at any maturity, and that occurrence likely would have attracted a variety of investors seeking to take advantage of the relative-value opportunity.
Following the financial crisis, however, the ratio of 10-year municipal bond yields to comparable 10-year Treasury yields has frequently hovered above 100% and even moved more than 200% during the most strained moments. After the crisis, this ratio attempted to revert to its historical relationship as the ratio on 10-year municipal bonds fell to about 82% as of May 2011. But even then, the upward slope of the trend remained intact and the ratio again reached more than 100% of Treasuries in late April 2013.1 (See Chart 1.) This recent increase also has taken the ratio back above its post-credit crisis average of 93.7% since 2009, according to the Municipal Market Monitor. Previously, the 10-year municipal/Treasury ratio was typically in the 80-85% range.
Based on the 10-year 'AAA' segment of the municipal bond market and the Treasury market, July 1, 2009–April 19, 2013
Source: Based on data from the Municipal Market Monitor.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
For illustrative purposes only and does not reflect any Lord Abbett mutual fund or any particular investment.
The income derived from municipal bonds may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Federal, state, and local taxes may apply. Treasuries are debt securities issued by the U.S. government and secured by its full faith and credit. Income from Treasury securities is exempt from state and local taxes.
Many investors have become accustomed to higher municipal/Treasury ratios, so the historical yield ratios may have less influence on their investment decisions. However, in an environment where investors' search for income has compressed the yields in most asset classes below their historical spread levels, investors should consider the rarity of a credit-spread relationship that remains above its long-term average.
Investors seeking relative-value opportunities might also want to consider what needs to occur for the yield ratio between municipal and Treasury yields to revert to its historical average. In that scenario, municipal bonds will need to outperform Treasuries. For this to happen, either Treasury yields would need to rise—which is one of the prominent concerns for fixed-income investors—while municipal yields would need to remain stable or rise to a much lesser extent. Another way the ratio could revert to its historical average is that Treasury yields could remain stable, while municipal yields decline.
When taking a broader look at the current yield environment, the higher yields on municipal bonds compared to Treasury securities reflect two major considerations. The first one has been investors' flight to the perceived safety of Treasuries given the recent bout of weaker than expected economic reports. The second one has been the Federal Reserve's monthly purchases of $85 billion in securities, including Treasuries, under its open-ended quantitative easing initiative.
The combination of these factors have pushed Treasury yields lower, while municipal bond yields have been held back by the presence of some incremental credit risk, despite being regarded as an asset class with traditionally strong credit quality, and the uncertainty regarding federal budget initiatives. In addition, municipal securities have encountered some seasonal selling pressure from investors who tend to sell bonds for tax-related reasons.
With municipal/Treasury yield ratios remaining above their historical levels, the Fed's pervasive influence on the Treasury market may have convinced some investors that higher municipal yields may not necessarily reflect relative-value opportunities. Instead, these investors may believe that these yields represent a new paradigm that persists even when the Fed starts to adjust monetary policy.
These investors should also consider that the financial advantages provided by municipal securities have not only remained in place but also have potentially improved. Therefore, investors should question whether such a new paradigm outweighs municipal bonds' exemption from federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income taxes. This characteristic may be of particular interest, considering the recent increase in the top marginal income tax bracket to 39.6% and the implementation of the 3.8% Medicare surcharge.
For those in the top marginal income tax bracket, these recent tax changes indicate that municipal securities with 'A' credit ratings provided a tax-equivalent yield of 4.61% as of March 31, 2013, compared to 2.46% from corporate bonds with similar credit ratings.2 Although municipal securities generally have longer maturities than corporate bonds, the difference of 215 basis points may reflect much more than the impact of slightly longer maturities.
These tax-equivalent yields reflect the value that investors may obtain from the tax benefit on municipal securities. Prior to 2008, this benefit typically would cost investors a notable amount of yield relative to taxable securities. Yet, that cost has steadily declined in recent years, to the point where investors could receive the tax benefit without giving up yield when compared to buying Treasury bonds. And in an environment where investors have scoured the fixed-income markets for every incremental-income opportunity and yields continue to compress toward Treasury rates, the minimal cost of the tax benefit on municipal securities may be an opportunity that remains available to many investors. It also may allow municipal bonds to outperform other fixed-income markets as the interest-rate environment continues to evolve.
A Note about Risk: The value of investments in fixed-income securities will change as interest rates fluctuate and in response to market movements. Generally, when interest rates rise, fixed-income prices fall, and when interest rates fall, fixed-income prices generally rise. The income derived from municipal bonds may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Federal, state, and local taxes may apply. There is a risk that a bond issued as tax-exempt may be reclassified by the IRS as taxable, creating taxable rather than tax-exempt income. Bonds may also be subject to other types of risk, such as call, credit, liquidity, interest-rate, and general market risks. No investing strategy can overcome all market volatility or guarantee future results.
Treasuries are debt securities issued by the U.S. government and secured by its full faith and credit. Income from Treasury securities is exempt from state and local taxes. Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect the deduction of fees or expenses, and are not available for direct investment.
The credit quality of the securities in a portfolio are assigned by a national recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), such as Standard & Poor's, Moody's, or Fitch, as an indication of an issuer's creditworthiness. Ratings range from 'AAA' (highest) to 'D' (lowest). Bonds rated 'BBB' or above are considered investment grade. Credit ratings 'BB' and below are lower-rated securities (junk bonds). High-yielding, non-investment-grade bonds (junk bonds) involve higher risks than investment-grade bonds. Adverse conditions may affect the issuer's ability to pay interest and principal on these securities.
Glossary of Terms:
Basis point is one hundredth of a percentage point, or 0.01%.
Maturity is the length of time before a bond matures and its principal is repaid.
The opinions in the preceding commentary are as of the date of publication and subject to change based on subsequent developments and may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole. This material is not intended to be legal or tax advice and is not to be relied upon as a forecast, or research or investment advice regarding a particular investment or the markets in general, nor is it intended to predict or depict performance of any investment. Investors should not assume that investments in the securities and/or sectors described were or will be profitable. This document is prepared based on information Lord Abbett deems reliable; however, Lord Abbett does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information. Investors should consult with a financial advisor prior to making an investment decision.
Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the Lord Abbett funds. This and other important information is contained in each fund’s summary prospectus and/or prospectus. To obtain a prospectus or summary prospectus on any Lord Abbett mutual fund, contact your investment professional or Lord Abbett Distributor LLC at 888-522-2388 or visit us at www.lordabbett.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest.